In Marxist theory , society consists of two parts: the base or substructure and superstructure. The base comprises the forces and relations of production e. The base determines society's other relationships and ideas to comprise its superstructure, including its culture , institutions , political power structures , roles , rituals , and state. While the relation of the two parts is not strictly unidirectional, as the superstructure often affects the base, the influence of the base is predominant. Marx and Engels warned against such economic determinism. In developing Alexis de Tocqueville 's observations, Marx identified civil society as the economic base and political society as the political superstructure.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2016|
|PDF File Size:||3.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In Marxist theory , society consists of two parts: the base or substructure and superstructure. The base comprises the forces and relations of production e. The base determines society's other relationships and ideas to comprise its superstructure, including its culture , institutions , political power structures , roles , rituals , and state.
While the relation of the two parts is not strictly unidirectional, as the superstructure often affects the base, the influence of the base is predominant. Marx and Engels warned against such economic determinism. In developing Alexis de Tocqueville 's observations, Marx identified civil society as the economic base and political society as the political superstructure. In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely [the] relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production.
The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness.
At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or—this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms—with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces, these relations turn into their fetters.
Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead, sooner or later, to the transformation of the whole, immense, superstructure. In studying such transformations, it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic, or philosophic—in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out.
Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such a period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production. Marx's theory of base and superstructure can be found in the disciplines of political science , sociology , anthropology , and psychology as utilized by Marxist scholars.
Across these disciplines the base-superstructure relationship, and the contents of each, may take different forms. Early sociologist Max Weber preferred a form of structuralism over a base and superstructure model of society in which he proposes that the base and superstructure are reciprocal in causality—neither economic rationality nor normative ideas rule the domain of society.
In summarizing results from his East Elbia research he notes that, contrary to the base and superstructure model "we have become used to," there exists a reciprocal relationship between the two.
The Italian political philosopher Antonio Gramsci divided Marx's superstructure into two elements: political society and civil society.
Political society consists of the organized force of society such as the police and military while civil society refers to the consensus-creating elements that contribute to cultural hegemony. Both constituents of this superstructure are still informed by the values of the base, serving to establish and enforce these values in society.
Walter Rodney , the Guyanese political activist and African historian, discussed the role of Marx's superstructure in the context of development cycles and colonialism. Rodney states that while most countries follow a developmental structure that evolves from feudalism to capitalism, China is an exception to this rule and skipped the capitalism step. In China, religious, educational and bureaucratic qualifications were of utmost importance, and government was in the hands of state officials rather than being run by the landlords on their own feudal estates.
By extension this means that the Marxist development cycle is malleable due to cultural superstructures, and is not an inevitable path. Rather the role of the superstructure allows for adaptation of the development cycle, especially in a colonial context. Freudo-Marxist Wilhelm Reich's discipline of analysis known as sex economy is an attempt to understand the divergence of the perceived base and superstructure that occurred during the global economic crisis from to In this new categorization, social ideology and social psychology is a material process that self-perpetuates, the same way economic systems in the base perpetuate themselves.
Reich focused on the role of sexual repression in the patriarchal family system as a way to understand how mass support for Fascism could arise in a society. Contemporary Marxist interpretations such as those of critical theory criticise this conception of the base—superstructure interaction and examine how each affects and conditions the other. Raymond Williams , for example, argues against loose, "popular" usage of base and superstructure as discrete entities which, he explains, is not the intention of Marx and Engels:.
So, we have to say that when we talk of 'the base', we are talking of a process, and not a state We have to revalue 'superstructure' towards a related range of cultural practices, and away from a reflected, reproduced, or specifically-dependent content. And, crucially, we have to revalue 'the base' away from [the] notion[s] of [either] a fixed economic or [a] technological abstraction, and towards the specific activities of men in real, social and economic relationships, containing fundamental contradictions and variations, and, therefore, always in a state of dynamic process.
John Plamenatz makes two counterclaims regarding the clear-cut separation of the base and superstructure. The first is that economic structure is independent from production in many cases, with relations of production or property also having a strong effect on production. Defenders of the theory claim that Marx believed in property relations and social relations of production as two separate entities. Colin Jenkins provides a critique on the role of the capitalist state in the era of neoliberalism , using base and superstructure theory as well as the work of Nicos Poulantzas.
Regarding developments in the United States during this era roughly , Jenkins highlights the nature in which political parties and the political system itself are inherently designed to protect the economic base of capitalism and, in doing so, have become "increasingly centralized, coordinated, and synchronized over the past half-century.
His analysis specifically addresses the role of both major parties, Democrats and Republicans, in the United States:. It reminds us of John Dewey's claim that, 'As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Theoretical works. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Economic determinism Historical materialism Marx's dialectic Marx's method Philosophy of nature. Related topics.
Related categories. Historical Materialism Marx, Engels, Lenin , p. Translated from German. Online version: marxists. Retrieved December 16, Moscow: Progress Publishers: Notes by R. The British Journal of Sociology , Vol. Latin American Perspectives. How Europe underdeveloped Africa.
Strickland, William, , Hill, Robert A. Baltimore, Maryland. The Mass Psychology of Fascism. New York: Albion, New Left Review. The Nature of Political Theory. David Miller and Larry Siedentop. Oxford [Oxfordshire: Clarendon, The Hampton Institute.
Retrieved Marxist phraseology and terminology. Barracks communism Base and superstructure Bourgeoisie Bourgeois democracy Bourgeois nationalism Bourgeois socialism Capitalist mode of production Class struggle Commodification Dialectics Dictatorship of the proletariat Historical materialism Imperialism Liquidationism Lumpenproletariat Means of labor Metabolic rift Petite bourgeoisie Primitive accumulation of capital Proletarian internationalism Proletarian revolution Pure communism Revolutionary spontaneity Revolutionary wave Scientific socialism Socialist mode of production Super-imperialism Theoretician Two stage theory Wage slavery Workers' council Workers' control World revolution.
Accumulation of capital Capital Capitalist mode of production Crisis of capitalism Commanding heights of the economy Commodity Commodity production Dominant ideology Exchange value Free association Law of value Materialism Means of production Mode of production Productive forces Production for use Relations of production Ruling class Simple commodity production Socialist mode of production Socially necessary labour time Socialization Social murder Subject of labor Surplus value Use value Value Worker cooperative.
Deformed workers' state Degenerated workers' state French Turn Permanent revolution Social revolution Transitional demand Uneven and combined development United front World revolution. Categories : Marxist terminology Theories of history Marxian economics Sociological terminology.
History Outline Portal:Society By country. Conflict theory Structural functionalism Symbolic interactionism Critical theory Positivism Social change Social constructionism. Part of a series on. Philosophy Economic determinism Historical materialism Marx's dialectic Marx's method Philosophy of nature. Outline Communism portal Philosophy portal Socialism portal.
Base and superstructure
Please log in to set a read status. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. You can filter on reading intentions from the list , as well as view them within your profile. Setting up reading intentions help you organise your course reading. It makes it easy to scan through your lists and keep track of progress. Here's an example of what they look like:. Your reading intentions are also stored in your profile for future reference.
Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory
A ny modern approach to a Marxist theory of culture must begin by considering the proposition of a determining base and a determined superstructure. From a strictly theoretical point of view this is not, in fact, where we might choose to begin. It is not that the two propositions necessarily deny each other or are in contradiction. But the proposition of base and superstructure, with its figurative element, with its suggestion of a definite and fixed spatial relationship, constitutes, at least in certain hands, a very specialized and at times unacceptable version of the other proposition.
Raymond Williams Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory